Back to discussions

A few hard-won lessons about expedite requests (after 8 placements)

0 readers this weekgeneral
@profm_2481's avatar
1mo ago·4 views·0 saves
Active discussion

I tend to hear a lot of anxiety about how to word expedite requests, so I wanted to share what has actually worked for me over the years. First, be direct. Editors are busy. Tell them you have an offer, name the journal, state the deadline, and ask if they can expedite review. You do not need three paragraphs explaining your article's significance because they have the manuscript. 


Second, do not apologize for expediting. You are not being rude. This is how the system works. I, for one, wasted years being too deferential and I believe it cost me placements. 


Third, if you have a T150 offer and you are expediting to T30 journals, be realistic about your chances. It can work, but the jump is not negligible. I have had much better luck expediting within a narrower range. I’ve found expediting to more of a strategic game than anything else, but like what any game, it’s learnable. Happy to answer questions if anyone has them.

2

Thread Toolkit

Live Journal Snapshot

14 decisions this week

View snapshot

Relevant Templates

3 expedite email templates

Community-tested phrasing

View templates

Outcome Loop

64% Replied
29% No reply
7% Declined
View outcomes

Come Back and Tell Us

Follow-ups make this community better. If this thread helped you, come back and share how it turned out.

0 Replies

No replies yet. Sign in to be the first to respond.
ExpeCitedExpeCited

Real-time law review placement data, crowdsourced and anonymized.

ExpeCited is an independent tracker and is not affiliated with any law journal or law school. Aggregate public data is anonymized; usernames appear only on profiles that users have chosen to make public.