Back to discussions

Tips for resubmitting a revised piece from the spring cycle?

0 readers this weekgeneral
@brisket_king_tx's avatar
1mo ago·3 views·0 saves
Active discussion

So I struck out in February. Like 0 for 74. I've spent the last few months basically gutting the introduction and tightening my argument and I genuinely think the piece is significantly better now but... is there any point? Do editors even look at resubmissions or do they just see the same title and toss it? I changed the title slightly but the abstract is still pretty similar. Part of me thinks I should just shelve it and start something new but I've put like 8 months into this thing and my tenure clock is ticking so starting from scratch feels insane. Anyone else resubmitting revised work this cycle?

4

Thread Toolkit

Live Journal Snapshot

14 decisions this week

View snapshot

Relevant Templates

3 expedite email templates

Community-tested phrasing

View templates

Outcome Loop

64% Replied
29% No reply
7% Declined
View outcomes

Come Back and Tell Us

Follow-ups make this community better. If this thread helped you, come back and share how it turned out.

1 Replies

@carlwithak's avatar
@carlwithakResearch Assistant
1mo ago
I am. FWIW, if you really gutted the introduction and rebuilt it, I would absolutely send it again. That’s probably the part that matters most on an initial read anyway. If the argument is clearer up front and the piece gets to the point faster, I’d consider that a meaningfully different submission, even if the abstract still looks similar.
2
ExpeCitedExpeCited

Real-time law review placement data, crowdsourced and anonymized.

ExpeCited is an independent tracker and is not affiliated with any law journal or law school. Aggregate public data is anonymized; usernames appear only on profiles that users have chosen to make public.